FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Monika Kryemadhi reacted through a post on social media, where she raised a series of questions addressed to SPAK and the former head of this institution, Altin Dumani, regarding the investigation against her and the use of telephone conversations as evidence.
Kryemadhi claims that the 240-page dossier, built on telephone conversations, is illegal and requires clarification on its legal basis.
In her response, she refers to decision no. 481, dated December 17, 2023, claiming that the court has found that the phone in question was not in her ownership. Based on this, Kryemadhi asks what evidence the accusation against her is based on.
On the other hand, she also raises the question of whether, if the prosecution claims that the phone was hers, where is the authorization required under Article 73 of the Constitution and Article 288 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Kryemadhi also wants to know what court decision authorized the opening and checking of the phone.
At the end of her reaction, she emphasizes that these questions require clear answers, closing the post with the words: "See you later...".
"Black envelope for Altin Dumani's SPAK."
Claim that you have built a 240-page file on Monika Kryemadhi's phone conversations.
But some questions arise:
1- With decision no. 481, dated 17.12.2023, the court decided that the phone does not belong to Monika Kryemadhi.
2- So, what evidence is the accusation based on?
3- If, on the contrary, you claim that the phone is hers, then where is the authorization required under Article 73 of the Constitution and Article 288 of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
4- By what court decision was my phone unlocked?
These questions require clear answers. See you later..." - writes Kryemadhi next to the video she published on her profile.
Lini një Përgjigje