FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
The Fier Court found Altin Kuka and his two sons guilty of the murder of two brothers Lavdrim and Gramoz Kurtaj.
The Fier Court has announced the verdict in the double murder case that occurred in 2024.
Altin Kuka was sentenced to life imprisonment, while his sons, Ervis Kuka and Emauriso Kuka, were sentenced to 30 and 25 years in prison, respectively. According to the court's decision, all three were found guilty of the shooting deaths of brothers Lavdrim Kurtaj, 46, and Gramoz Kurtaj, 52. According to the indictment, the crime was committed for weak motives.
With this decision, the Fier Court has convicted the three defendants in the first instance for one of the most serious criminal events of 2024 in the Fier district.
Court decision:
The guilty plea of the defendant AK for committing the criminal offense of "Murder in other qualifying circumstances", committed in collaboration, provided for by Article 79, letter "dh" of 25, of the Criminal Code and his sentence to life imprisonment.
The guilty plea of the defendant AK for committing the criminal offense of "Unauthorized possession and production of weapons, explosive weapons and ammunition" provided for by Article 278/1 of the Criminal Code and his sentence under this provision to 6 (six) years of imprisonment.
Pursuant to Article 55 of the Criminal Code, in conjunction with the sentences, the defendant AK, with life imprisonment,
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Murder in other qualifying circumstances", committed in collaboration, provided for by Article 79 letter "dh" and 25 of the Criminal Code and his sentence to 25 years of imprisonment.
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Unauthorized possession and production of weapons, explosive weapons and ammunition" provided for by Article 278/3 of the Criminal Code and his sentence under this provision to 1 (one) year of imprisonment.
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Unauthorized possession and production of weapons, explosive weapons and ammunition" provided for by Article 278/4 of the Criminal Code and his sentence under this provision to 2 (two) years of imprisonment.
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Unlicensed production, possession, purchase or sale of cold weapons" provided for by Article 279/1 of the Criminal Code and his sentence under this provision to 1 (one) year of imprisonment.
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Intentional light injury", provided for by Article 89 of the Criminal Code and his sentence under this provision of 1 (one) year of imprisonment.
Pursuant to Article 55 of the Criminal Code, the above sentences were combined into a single sentence, definitively sentencing the defendant EK to 27 years in prison.
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Murder in other qualifying circumstances", committed in collaboration, provided for by Article 79 letter "dh" and 25 of the Criminal Code and his sentence to 27 years of imprisonment.
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Unauthorized possession and production of weapons, explosive weapons and ammunition" provided for by Article 278/1 of the Criminal Code and his sentence to 6 (six) years of imprisonment.
The guilty plea of the defendant EK for committing the criminal offense of "Irregular Driving" provided for by Article 291 of the Criminal Code and his sentence to 6 (six) months imprisonment.
Pursuant to Article 55 of the Criminal Code, the above sentences were combined into a single sentence, definitively sentencing the defendant EK to 30 years in prison.
Pursuant to Articles 190 and 217 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, material evidence is available according to the reasoning part of the decision.
Procedural costs in the investigation phase and in the trial are borne jointly by the defendants.
An appeal against this decision is allowed to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction within 15 days from the day after the notification of this decision.
The dynamics of murder
According to the Prosecution, shortly before the crime, Ervis Kukaj had a physical conflict with Gramoz Kurtaj's sons, and fired a pistol at them and the victim.
After telephone communication, the two brothers Ervis Kukaj and Emauris Kukaj met and the latter told the story.
Ervis Kukaj had left the firearm, a Model 56 combat automatic, with which Altin Kukaj shot the victims in the hut next to the poultry house with the intention of taking it later with Emauris Kukaj.
The latter, after taking the firearm, an automatic combat weapon, went to the place where the victims were, stopped immediately in front of their bar, took the weapon and loaded its magazine, urging his father to fire a volley at them.
Altin Kukaj shot the victims Gramoz and Lavdimir Kurtaj with an automatic rifle, which he took from the hand of his son Emauris Kukaj.
Lini një Përgjigje