FLASH
Shkruar nga Gjergj Zefi
The crisis with Iran highlighted the limits of American unilateralism and proved that without allies, even superpowers quickly lose their political advantage...
There are moments when a superpower, despite its arsenals and rhetoric, is forced to confront its own political limits.
This is exactly what is happening to the United States in this new episode of clashes with Iran. What initially appeared as a demonstration of strength and strategic will is ending up as an attempt to control the damage, reduce costs and find 'emergency steps' to quickly emerge from a crisis that risks expanding beyond initial calculations.
Essentially, the problem is not just military. It is diplomatic. When an actor of this weight acts on impulse, viewing consultation with allies more as a formality than a necessity, the first consequence is political isolation. And isolation, in geopolitics, is always the most expensive form of overconfidence.
This crisis has shown once again that alliances do not function on the logic of authoritarianism. They require coordination, prudence and, above all, respect for the strategic intelligence of partners.
At this point, Europe appeared more sober, more reserved, and more aware of the long-term consequences of an escalation in the Middle East.
Not because there are fewer interests at stake, but because I know better that, when force is disconnected from diplomatic reason, it quickly loses legitimacy.
This is precisely where the irony lies. Washington entered with the language of absolute determination, but is leaving with the language of exit management. It entered to impose the pace of events; it is leaving adapting to them. It entered as a cowboy; it is leaving, in the international political perception, 'with its tail in the saddle'.
In the end, the lesson is clear: in today's international order, even the greatest strength cannot replace the wisdom of alliances. And whenever foreign policy is confused with the instinct of protagonism, history usually produces the same result. / Pamphlet
Yes!!! Editorial i shkurter por i shkelqyer.Nuk jemi kursesi me Iranin por nuk na pelqen arroganca qe mund tna tregoje cfare bluze te veshim ne mengjes,dreke apo darke. Fck arrogances.Sado te medhenj apo te vegjel jemi te barabarte para Zotit
Bravo! Ai ka qenë kauboji i pamatur, tyta e armës së të cilit ishte bërë një "U" (patkoi i kuq) nga Khamanei.
Sa i shkon bishti.
E ke qarë, me lot currila.
Eshte paralajmerim i J.Bidenit qe ne 2023 per situaten e sotme,fatkeqesisht ai ishte i vjeter dhe Zv Presidenti/ja ishte shume e dobet. Trump flet ne emer te SHBA ndaj eshte problem. Nuk eshte pare ndonjehere nje sjellje e tille e nje presidenti te SHBA, arrogant dhe vulgar ndaj kujdo,vetem e vetem pse paraardhesit e tij e ngriten SHBA ne nivelin me te tarte ekonomik,demokratik dhe ushtarak, por sic e analizon dhe artikulli, nuk eshte çudi qe ky si asnje tjeter me pare te zbythet vete.Duket se nuk ka fuqi te perballet me Putinin dhe ben si beu i fshatit me europianet te cilet i ka zene ne gjume per shkak te vendit qe ai perfaqeson,jo se nuk e njihnin.Por europianet nuk eshte se nuk kane eksperience lufte,dihet se ato i kane hapur lufterat e medha dhe me aleanca kane mundur diktatore e kriminele.pasi kane vuajtur shum gjate gjithe shekujve,por kur shteron arsyea,edhe gjykimi del jashte kontrolli. Edhe Netanjahu te mos e kruaj me europianet shume te arsyeshem se nje dite te bukur perfundon si Sllobodani. Israeli eshte i pranuar si vend europian nga europa liberale dhe demokratike dhe ka vendin e saj ne Europe. Nese perjashtohet, nuk i mbetet gje tjeter te shkoje ne Azi apo Rusine e putinit.Por me mire I del me europianet. Sa per Iranin,ky sistem e meritonte nje ndeshkim, pasi per 45 vjet, duke folur ne gjuhe urrejtje,kercenime per zhdukje, mallkinlme, e sulme kunder fqinjeve dhe shteteve demokratike. Por lufta kerkon arsye dhe aleate qe ky Trump I ka perçmuar dhe injoruar.