FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
The actress's contradictory statements about sexual harassment; from public denial to emotional confession on "Big Brother", reveal a character who changes roles according to the stage and audience...
Egla Ceno, the most controversial resident of Big Brother, seems to have two versions of herself, one for the screen and another for the internet. In the famous show, she declared that 30 years ago she was sexually harassed at work by moderator Saimir Kodra, emerging as a symbol of abused women and a voice of revolt against injustice.
But, just a few months ago, in a public podcast, the same Egla declared with complete conviction that “in my entire life I have never experienced sexual harassment at work” and that “if it had happened to me, I would have immediately gone to the police, because these are staged scenes.” She even emphasized that she does not connect “life events with movements,” ironizing the very cause that she claims to represent today.
It seems that we are dealing with two Eglas, one who speaks of justice and victimization to the television audience, and the other who speaks of rationality and distrust in previous interviews. The only thing that remains true in this story is the fact that Egla knows how to play roles better than anyone, sometimes as an actress, sometimes as a victim, but always in the spotlight.
Yesterday, in another public appearance, Egla Ceno emotionally declared that she was "in court just because she spoke out," presenting herself as the voice of abused women and as a symbol of a collective struggle for justice.
She emphasized that this issue was not personal, but a cause that represented all women who have experienced violence or injustice, turning her story into a public mission. But this version contradicts her previous statements, where she denied any similar experience and mocked these causes themselves, adding even more confusion to the public's perception of who Egla Ceno really is, a victim seeking justice or an actress changing the script according to the moment.
Is this a "cause for abused women" or just another scene from the never-ending series of public hypocrisy?/ Pamphlet
Lini një Përgjigje