FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
While commenting on SPAK's request to lift the immunity of MP Belinda Balluku, the journalist stated that this time, SPAK has acted differently than any other time, and even than any prosecutor before, for similar cases.
According to Hoxha, this is the first time that the Parliament has been told that the lifting of immunity is required to 'replace the measure of banning him from leaving the country with arrest.' But she revealed that SPAK is rushing with Balluk.
" SPAK is awaiting a decision tomorrow from the Court of Appeals, and for this reason, it is understood that unlike any request from any prosecution, even those before, there is a difference when it says; through the replacement of the measure from a ban on leaving the country to house arrest, this makes you understand that SPAK, despite the evidence, is trying to treat the Assembly as a court instance, by saying 'for a replacement measure'. The Parliament does not decide on a measure, it removes immunity and paves the way, the prosecutor goes for a new measure... he has not clarified whether he will request house arrest or prison, he reveals this surprise to the court.
Immunity was requested for Tahiri, it was not requested through the measure... so it is not said we will replace the measure. The difference is that when it is said to the deputies, it is said that the measure will be replaced.
What has changed? Why was SPAK in such a hurry? Rushed by the statute of limitations, we are forced to communicate your status as a defendant, this shows the difficulties SPAK is facing, why did it take so long? What tied SPAK's hands to burn through these deadlines? Why did it move so slowly? It is true that it is a complex issue, but who stopped a prosecutor from forming a group of prosecutors? In the finals, we will go back to the procedure, this path warns of easing the case , "said journalist Anila Hoxha in "Top Story".
Lini një Përgjigje