FLASH
Shkruar nga Gjergj Zefi
Israel's strategy to impose order in the Middle East through force is risking producing an endless cycle of conflict...
In the Middle East, war is no longer just a tool of politics. It is becoming politics itself. In the case of today's Israel, this transformation has become evident: national security is increasingly being conceived through permanent conflict; while diplomacy, compromise, and political projects for peace have been pushed to the periphery. War is no longer seen as a temporary condition to achieve stability, but as the only conceivable horizon.
Benjamin Netanyahu's government has constructed a clear narrative: Israel is in an existential siege by Iran and its network of regional allies. From Gaza to Lebanon, from Syria to the Persian Gulf, every front is presented as part of the same mosaic of threats. This approach has justified an aggressive military strategy, which aims to destroy not only direct adversaries, but the entire regional architecture of Iranian influence.
But the problem does not lie in Israel's need for security. No state can ignore real threats to its existence. The problem arises when war becomes the automatic response to every political and strategic equation.
The moment military power becomes the main, and often the only, instrument of foreign policy, it begins to produce a dangerous paradox: every tactical victory creates the conditions for a new conflict.
This is precisely the dilemma that is emerging in the region today. Military operations may temporarily weaken Hamas, Hezbollah, or structures linked to Iran, but they do not produce a new political order. Gaza remains an open wound, Lebanon a state in deep crisis, and Syria a fragmented space where regional actors test the limits of their power. In this reality, every military offensive temporarily solves one problem, but creates several others.
Moreover, the strategy of continuous escalation has a domino effect that risks engulfing the entire region. The confrontation with Iran is no longer a secret conflict in the shadows, but a rivalry that is increasingly turning into direct clashes. In this dangerous game, any miscalculation could turn into a crisis much bigger than the fragmented conflicts that have dominated the Middle East in recent decades.
The irony is that Israel is one of the most militarily powerful states in the world. It has a technologically advanced military, a developed economy, and the strategic backing of the United States. Yet this extraordinary strength has not yet produced a lasting formula for peace with its neighbors. Military power may impose order for a period, but it rarely creates the political legitimacy that long-term stability requires.
The history of the Middle East is replete with examples where military victory has been confused with political resolution. The reality has usually been much more complex. Unresolved conflicts do not disappear; they simply transform, resurface, and erupt in new forms.
The strategic dilemma facing Israel today is therefore not simply military. It is profoundly political and historical: can security be built on a permanent architecture of war? Or will this approach, however successful on the battlefield, only produce an even more unstable region, where each generation inherits the conflict of the previous generation?
If war becomes an ideology, then peace ceases to be an objective. And when peace is no longer an objective, conflicts never end, they only change form./ Pamphlet
Do te te quaj Bibi antisemit.
Interesat e SHBA dhe popullit izraelit e kërkojnë mbylljen e konfliktit. Në këtë luftë nuk ka fitues. Netanjahu e hëngri në besë Donald Tramp dhe SHBA. Fjalën e fundit ka kneset.