FLASH
Shkruar nga Lutfi Dervishi
Where are the edgy sentences, the human errors, the jokes, the irony, the rhythm, the flow that cannot be imitated?
What happens when an engineer, a doctor, a painter, a member of parliament and a journalist write the same?
What happens is what we see so often today: the texts resemble sheep sheared by the same shepherd. They have the same cut, the same skin, the same stamp, but no distinguishing marks.
The world is beautiful because people are different. “Mind is mind in this world, mind is not like mind.” When all texts start to sound the same, not only is style and variety lost, but the most important thing in communication is lost: trust.
This increasingly annoying Maoist uniformity has a name: the unwise use of AI.
“This is not just a deal, it is a testament that every step has a cost…” or strained metaphors like “prices that scare even the clouds”, are typical structures, generated with a click. Ready-made hyperbole, artificial contrasts and a synthetic “flavor” that is filling our pages.
You miss and rejoice that you still find posts written by humans, you still hear speeches produced by the mind, you still understand from the style who the author is... Where are the edgy sentences, the human errors, the jokes, the irony, the rhythm, the flow that cannot be imitated?
Should AI be used?
Absolutely. AI is the perfect assistant when you are a master of your craft. But when you let it take the wheel, it comes undone. The digital twin should be the best version of yourself, not a prosthesis for our laziness, mediocrity or ignorance. In fact, perhaps the question that should be asked is: what is left of you if AI takes you away?
To have a healthy body, we seek organic food, why don't we do the same for our mind?
Today, streams of AI-generated content are surging, and perhaps the future of journalism will be "bio news," news that smells of the field, not the office, news that arises from suspicion, not from Googling, news that is verified by humans. The product of the human mind will be "premium."
Today's bio journalism is not simply "this happened", "he said", "she answered"... This journalism today is a resistance to the loss of identity, a battle against uniformity. If this resistance fails, fewer and fewer people will read, because they will get tired of reading a style, feeling a rhythm, an artificial intonation, a world where every sentence sounds like it was written by the same hand, or worse, by NOBODY.
Everywhere for anyone who dares/tries to bring to market products of the mind, written by human hands.
Lini një Përgjigje