FLASH
Shkruar nga Pamfleti
Analyst Skënder Minxhozi has evaluated the political role of Servet Pëllumbi in the early years of pluralism, describing him as one of the key figures who kept the Socialist Party afloat in a difficult political and institutional period.
Minxhozi said that Pëllumbi played an important role, especially after the arrest of Fatos Nano, when the Socialist Party was under strong political pressure and in a tense relationship with the international factor.
According to him, Pëllumbi and his associates managed to maintain the functioning of the party in a difficult political climate.
"Only a stable nervous system and nerves of steel like Servet Pëllumbi and some of his associates could keep a party that had many difficulties ahead," said Minxhozi.
The analyst emphasized that Pëllumbi was not part of the political backroom games, but maintained a more institutional and intellectual profile. He described him as a different figure from Sali Berisha and Fatos Nano, both in style and in the way he practiced politics.
Minxhozi added that in later years Pëllumbi became more of a moral and spiritual authority for the Socialist Party, rather than a politician of daily decision-making.
"Servet Pëllumbi's exit from the political scene was among the most dignified ," he said on the "Real Story" show.
Minxhozi: I think that Servet Pëllumbi's major role is when the SP leader was put in handcuffs. Perhaps this marked the fate of Nano as well, since July '93 the SP was in a tailspin in relation to the international factor, it was also on a red line with the Americans and Europeans. Servet Pëllumbi remained standing in the absence of the leader in the party that won the constitutional referendum in '94. He maintained an opposition in the conditions of a crazy decade. A climate of terror. Only a stable nervous system and nerves of steel like Servet Pëllumbi and some of his associates could keep a party that had many difficulties ahead. Servet Pëllumbi's role was important, he was a figure who belonged more to the researcher's cabinet. He was a total antipode of Sali Berisha, but also of Fatos Nano in other styles. Pluralism in Albania began with the imprisonment of the leader of the opposition. Servet Pëllumbi and his associates were able, in Nano's absence until his release from prison, to keep a party afloat that was later proven to have been favored. I'm left with the '90s, which were more decisive, and later he was more of a spiritual and, so to speak, moral authority of the party than a decision-making politician. But he saw that the game between Nano and Berisha would continue in other terms, and it was proven. He was not one of those behind the scenes and tried to hold on to a position that was right for him, the position of Speaker of the Assembly. But Servet Pëllumbi's exit from the stage was one of the most dignified.
Lini një Përgjigje