FLASH
Shkruar nga Gjergj Zefi
Four serious cases of poisoning, a company that continues to feed public institutions and a state that remains silent. When responsibility is avoided, the risk is no longer an accident, but a system...
There comes a point when a society stops debating procedures and starts demanding accountability. That point comes when an event is no longer a coincidence, but a repetition. When citizens hear again about suspected poisonings in public institutions, the question is not just what happened. The question is why the system didn’t stop it from happening again.
If reports of repeated episodes of poisoning and food safety problems prove to be accurate, then it is not enough to count the sick, take a few laboratory samples, and provide a few bureaucratic explanations.
The state must explain why an economic operator continues to supply public institutions if serious suspicions are raised about it or violations have been found by the competent authorities. This is no longer a market issue. This is a matter of public trust.
The situation becomes even more worrying when a figure with a political past and a history that has sparked public debate is mentioned as the head of such a company. In a normal state, such a profile does not constitute evidence of guilt and cannot replace an investigation. But it increases the obligation of institutions for transparency. The greater the influence of a person, the greater the distance of the state from any suspicion of privilege or protection should be.
No one demands punishments without trial. But no one can accept impunity as a model of administration either. When a case is repeated, citizens have the right to ask whether controls work, whether public contracts are re-evaluated, and whether institutions protect the public interest or comfort themselves behind forms and communiqués.
Food is not a commodity like any other. It enters schools, hospitals, dormitories, academies and institutions where people have no choice. Precisely for this reason, the standard of responsibility must be much higher. Any negligence can have consequences for the health of dozens or hundreds of people.
If after every alarm we hear the same promises and see the same operators continuing their activities as if nothing had happened, then the problem is no longer limited to one company. The problem passes to the institutions that license, control, contract and supervise. They must be held accountable for their decisions.
The question is not rhetorical. It is the essence of this story.
What do you expect, to poison us all?
Because the state is not measured by how it reacts to an alarm. The state is measured by the ability to prevent the next alarm. When this ability is lacking, citizens lose not only security at the table, but also the trust that someone is protecting their interests. And this is the most dangerous poisoning./ Pamphlet
kjo eshte per te antimafia o gjergj
ORE MBYLLE KALOJE NE LISTE TE ZEZE PRONARIN MOS TE MARRE ME TENDERA TALL B KA TE TJERE PLOT QE MUND TE USHQEJNE ME NDER E DINJITET, PA FRYRE EDHE FATURAT APP TENDERAT AQ