And then we wonder why orders, warnings, investments, even murders come out of the cells. If the infrastructure exists, anything is possible.
When you hear the word prison, nothing surprises you anymore.
After the video where VIP convicts organize a kind of wedding inside their cell, the question is no longer "how did it happen", but "what haven't we seen yet".
Party in prison? We saw this Alcohol? It's just a matter of quality. Drugs? Definitely pure goods. Escort? No problem at all. Weapons? We've seen this too. Not shooting in the air at parties, but against the one we consider an enemy.
When you see the comfort of VIP prisoners, anything seems possible. It's just a matter of price.
The problem is not that watching this video makes you naively ask: who makes the law in prison?
The contrast is brutal. On the one hand, political figures who are treated with rigor to send a message and on the other, underworld figures who live better than most of those living abroad.
Perhaps the biggest threat that can be made to them is: "keep some order or we'll kick you out."
And then we wonder why orders, warnings, investments, even murders come out of the cells. If the infrastructure exists, anything is possible.
That stall has that dairy. And this stall has been producing enviable yields for some time.
Logic would require that after the video was published, we would not only have control, but there would also be no analysis, measures, concrete responsibility, accountability, and name and surname.
But it seems that logic is not always part of the scenario.
Perhaps it is more honest to give up the illusion.
Instead of claiming that we have prisons, administration, and leaders, we should admit that we have spaces with flexible management.
After all, the model exists. Pablo Escobar built his own prison to his own taste. We have a more modest, but still functional, version.
This is how the exclusively Albanian expression: prison is for men! takes on an exhaustive meaning.
Lini një Përgjigje